Sharing Responsibility: Neuromarketing and the Qualitative Market Researcher
Jack Ellingham
Abstract
Neuromarketing refers to a range of research methods that study the consumers emotional and unconscious responses (Sebastian 2014; Stipp 2015; Belk 2017; Noble 2017; Romano 2017). Likewise, qualitative research can be used to understand the motivations of consumer decisions (Bryman and Bell 2015). Neuromarketing produces highly objective data (Belk 2017; Noble 2017), whereas qualitative data is subjective (Bryman and Bell 2015). Therefore, does neuromarketing pose a threat to the practice of qualitative research? Whilst this may be the case, the extant literature asserts that all research that seeks to understand human behaviour must be conducted by a human (Seidman 1998; Baron and White 2015). This suggests that neuromarketing may not threaten qualitative practice, but compete with the competency of qualitative market researchers instead. In total, eight in-depth interviews with experienced qualitative market researchers were conducted which sought to understand how qualitative market researchers are being affected by neuromarketing. The findings of this research support existing knowledge on how neuromarketing should be used in qualitative methodologies, and stresses the importance of the qualitative market researcher in the collection and contextualisation of all data. This dissertation concludes that the responsibility of qualitative market researchers is shared across the neuromarketing process with the technology, external research partners and research buyers.References
Ariely, D. and Berns, G. S., 2010. Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nature Reviews Neuroscience [online], 11 (4), 284-292.
Belk, R. W., 2017. Qualitative Research in Advertising. Journal of Advertising [online], 46 (1), 36-47.
Baron, E. and White, B., 2015. Is technology eating qualitative research? The very real impact of digital disruption on qualitative agencies [online]. London: WARC.
Bercea, M. D., 2013. Quantitative versus Qualitative in neuromarketing research [online]. Munich: MPRA.
Bercea, M. D., 2015. Neuroethics and Responsibility in Conducting Neuromarketing Research. Neuroethics [online], 8, 191-202.
Bowleg, L., 2017. Towards a critical health equity research stance: why epistemology and methodology matter more than qualitative methods. Health Education and
Behaviour [online], 44 (5), 677-684.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in Psychology [online], 3 (2), 77-101.
Bryman, A. and Bell, E., 2015. Business Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brannen, J., 2005. Mixed methods research: a discussion paper [online]. Southampton:
National Centre for Research Methods.
Camerer, C. and Yoon, C., 2015. Introduction to the Journal of Marketing Research
Special Issue on Neuroscience and Marketing. American Marketing Association [online], 52, 423-426.
Carter, S. M. and Little, M., 2007. Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research.
Qualitative Health Research [online], 17 (10), 1316-1328.
Cascio, C. N., Scholz, C. and Falk, E. B., 2015. Social influence and the brain: persuasion, susceptibility to influence and retransmission. Current Opinion in Behavioural Science [online], 3, 51-57.
Chandra, Y. and Shang, L., 2016. An RQDA-based constructivist methodology for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal [online], 20
(1), 90-112.
Chandler, J., 2013. Seven Pillars of Wisdom: The Idea of Qualitative Research. The International Journal of Market Research [online], 55 (5), 627.
Clark, K., 2017. In: Thomas, A. R., Pop, N. A,. Iorga, A. M. and Ducu, C., eds. Ethics and Neuromarketing: Implications for Market Research and Business Practice [online].
Switzerland: Springer, 147-156.
Ćoisić, D., 2016. Neuromarketing in Market Research. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems [online], 14 (2), 139-147.
Daugherty, T. and Hoffman, E., 2017. In: Thomas, A. R., Pop, N. A,. Iorga, A. M. and
Ducu, C., eds. Ethics and Neuromarketing: Implications for Market Research and Business Practice [online]. Switzerland: Springer, 5-30.
Dilley, P., 2004. Interviews and the Philosophy of Qualitative Research. The Journal of Higher Education [online], 75 (1), 127-132.
Ducu, C., 2017. In: Thomas, A. R., Pop, N. A,. Iorga, A. M. and Ducu, C., eds. Ethics and Neuromarketing: Implications for Market Research and Business Practice [online].
Switzerland: Springer, 31-64.
Fisher, R. J., 1993. Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning.
Journal of Consumer Research [online], 20 (2), 303-315.
Graves, P., 2010. Consumer.ology [online]. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S., 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research.
Handbook of qualitative research [online], 2, 163-194.
Guest, G., Namey, E., Taylor, J., Eley, N. and McKenna, K., 2017. Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from randomized study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology [online], 20 (6), 693-708.
Hensel, D., Wolter, L. C. and Znanewitz, J., 2017. In: Thomas, A. R., Pop, N. A,. Iorga, A. M. and Ducu, C., eds. Ethics and Neuromarketing: Implications for Market Research and Business Practice [online]. Switzerland: Springer, 65-88.
Madrigal, D. and McClain, B., 2012. Strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research. UX Matters [online], 3 September 2012. Available from:
https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2012/09/strengths-and-weaknesses-ofquantitative-and-qualitative-research.php [Accessed 11 May 2018].
Mays, N. and Pope, C., 2000. Assessing Quality in Qualitative Research. British Medical Journal [online], 320 (7226), 50-52.
Meloy, J. M., 2001. Writing the qualitative dissertation: understanding by doing [online]. 2nd ed. London: Psychology Press.
Newman, J. M., 2000. Action research: a brief overview. Qualitative Social Research [online], 1 (1)
Noble, T., 2017. How neuroscience is advancing consumer insights [online]. Washington DC: Admap.
Petty, N. J., Thomson, O. P. and Stew, G., 2012. Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 1: Introducing the philosophy of qualitative research. Manual Therapy [online], 17 (4), 267 -274.
Polkingthorne, D. E., 1995. Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Jounral of Qualitative Studies in Education [online], 8 (1), 5-23.
Pozharliev, R., Verbeke, W., Strien, J. W. and Bagozzi, R., 2015. Merely being with you increases my attention to luxury products: using EEG to understand consumers’ emotional experience with luxury branded products. Journal of Marketing Research [online], 52, 546-548.
Precourt, G., 2017. The neuroscience winner in advertising: creativity [online].
Washington DC: WARC.
Rice, C., 2017. Danger of forgetting our skills. InBrief [online], November 2017. Available from: https://www.aqr.org.uk/a/20171130-danger-of-forgetting-skills [Accessed 21 February 2018].
Romano, J., 2017. State of the art of science and evidence-based neuromarketing: future directions for the applications of neurosciences into market research. In: Anon.,
#IN: Insights, Intelligence, Innovation, Buenos Aires 5-7 April. Buenos Aires: ESOMAR World Research. Available from:
https://www.warc.com/content/article/esomar/state_of_the_art_of_science_and_evidencebased_neuromarketing_future_directions_for_the_applications_of_neuroscienc es_into_market_research/110789 [Accessed 22 February 2018].
Rubin, H. J. and Rubin, I. S., 1995. Qualitative Interviewing: the art of hearing data. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
Ryen, A., 2004. Ethical Issues. In: Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. and Silverman D., eds. Qualitative research practice [online]. London: SAGE, 230-247.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2009. Research Methods for Business Students. 1st ed. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Sebastian, V., 2014. Neuromarketing and evaluation of cognitive and emotional responses of consumers to marketing stimuli. Social and Behavioural Sciences [online], 127, 753-757.
Seidman, I., 1998. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in
Education and the Social Sciences [online]. 3rd ed. London: Teachers College Press. Available from: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2669.pdf [Accessed 22 February 2017].
Smith, K., Todd, M. and Waldman, J., 2009. Doing your undergraduate social science dissertation [online]. New York: Routledge.
Stipp, H., 2015. The evolution of neuromarketing research: from novelty to mainstream. Journal of Advertising Research [online], 55 (2), 120-122.
Szentesi, S. G., 2017. Book review: ethics and neuromarketing implications for market research and business practice. Amfiteatru Economic [online], 25 June 2017.
Thomas, A. R., Pop, N. A., Iorga, A. M. and Ducu, C., 2017. Ethics and Neuromarketing: Implications for Market Research and Business Practice [online]. Switzerland: Springer.
Trettel, A., Cherubino, P., Cartocci, G., Rossi, D., Modica, E., Maglione, A. G., di Flumeri. and Babiloni, F., 2017. In: Thomas, A. R., Pop, N. A,. Iorga, A. M. and Ducu, C., eds. Ethics and Neuromarketing: Implications for Market Research and Business Practice [online]. Switzerland: Springer, 101-112.
WARC., 2018. What we know about qualitative theories and methods [online]. London: WARC Best Practice.
Wardle, J., 2002. Developing advertising with qualitative market research [online]. London: SAGE.
