A Biographical Study of Mobile Phones as Cherished Possessions
Danica Gilbert
Abstract
Current consumer research focuses on possessions with one biography, or possessions with many biographies due to multiple owners. Findings uncover the presence of two biographies co-existing within one possession, a contractual mobile phone. Furthermore, this object is neither fully owned, nor rented temporarily, contrasting to existing literature. The research is phenomenological, with a combined methodology of a biographical letter written by participants, followed by a face-to-face interview. The sample included nine participants from the south of England, and explored their mobile phone experiences. From this data, this article explores the mobile phone's biography and the affect had on its biographical stage and network. This research found that a contractual mobile phone embodies the biography of the device and the biography of the digital content. Attachment to the device was ephemeral, however the digital content displayed ongoing singularization. From this, the relationships consumers have with mobile phones as valued possessions are identified.References
Ackerman, D. S., 1999. Why we want to buy bigger and better toys: The measurement and consequences of relative deprivation in consumer behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International [online], 60 (6-A), 21-30.
Bardhi, F. and Eckhardt, G. M., 2012. Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 39 (4), 881-898.
Barriball, L. and While, A., 1994. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of advanced nursing [online], 19 (2), 328-335.
Belk, R. W., 1979. Gift-giving behavior. In: Sheth, J. N., ed. Research in Marketing. Greenwich CT: JAI, 95-126.
Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M. and Sherry Jr, J. F., 1989. The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 16 (1), 1-38.
Bitsch, V., 2005. Qualitative research: a grounded theory example and evaluation criteria. Journal of Agribusiness [online], 23 (1), 75-91.
Chalmers, T. D., and Arthur, D., 2008. Hard-core members' of consumption-oriented subcultures enactment of identity: the sacred consumption of two subcultures. Advances in Consumer Research [online], 35 (1), 570-575.
Chen, L., Yan, Z., Tang, W., Yang, F. Xie, X., and He, J., 2016. Mobile phone addiction levels and negative emotions among Chinese young adults: The mediating role of interpersonal problems. Computers in Human Behaviour [online], 55 (B), 856-866.
Cooper-Marcus, C., 1992. Environmental memories. In: Low, S. M. and Altman, I., eds. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment [online]. New York: Plenum Press, 87-112.
Creswell, J. W., 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Choosing among Five Approaches 2nd edition. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rochberg-Halton, E., 1981. The Meaning of Things: symbols and the self [online]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Denegri-Knott, J. and Molesworth, M., 2009. ‘I’ll sell this and I’ll buy them that’: Ebay and the management of possessions as stock. Journal of Consumer Behaviour [online], 8 (6), 305-315.
Denegri-Knott, J., Watkins, R. and Woods, J. 2012. Transforming digital virtual goods into meaningful possessions. In: Molesworth, M. and Denegri-Knott, J., eds. Digital Virtual Consumption [online]. London: Routledge, 76-91.
Epp, A. M. and Price, L. L., 2010. The storied life of singularized objects: forces of agency and network transformation. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 36 (5), 820-837.
Farmer, A.,2015. SIM-only on the march as consumers hold on to handsets for longer [online]. YouGov UK. Available from: https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/08/19/sim-only-march-consumers-hold-handsets-longer/ [Accessed 16 March 2017].
Gaus, G., 2012. Property and ownership. In: Estund, D., ed. Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy [online]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93-112.
Heisley, D. D. and Levy, S. J., 1991. Autodriving: a photoelicitation technique. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 18 (3), 257-272.
Hoffner, C. A., Lee, S. and Park, S. J., 2016. 'I miss my mobile phone!': self-expansion via mobile phone and responses to phone loss. New Media and Society [online], 18 (11), 2452-2468.
Hogg, M. K. and Maclaran, P., 2008. Rhetorical issues in writing interpretivist consumer research. International Journal [online], 11 (2), 130–146.
Holloway, I. and Galvin, K., 2017. Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare [online]. 4th edition. Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
Jenkins, R., Molesworth, M. and Scullion, R., 2014. The messy social lives of objects: inter-personal borrowing and the ambiguity of possession and ownership. Journal of Consumer Behaviour [online], 13 (2) 131-139.
Karanika, K. and Hogg, M.K., 2013. Trajectories across the lifespan of possession-self relationships. Journal of Business Research [online], 66 (7), 910-916.
Kopytoff, I. 1986. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as a process. In: Appadurai, A., ed. The Social Life of Things: commodities in a cultural perspective. [online]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64-94.
Lastovicka, J. L. and Fernandez, K. V., 2005. Three paths to disposition: the movement of meaningful possessions to strangers. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 31 (4), 813-823.
McCracken, G., 1986. Culture and consumption: a theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 13 (1), 71-84.
Miller, D., 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption [online]. Oxford: Blackwell.
Moeller, S. and Wittkowski, K., 2010. The burdens of ownership: reasons for preferring renting. Managing Service Quality [online], 20 (2), 176-191.
Molesworth, M. and Denegri-Knott, J., 2007. Digital play and the actualization of the consumer imagination. Games and Culture: a Journal of Interactive Media [online]. 2 (2), 114-133.
Molesworth, M., Watkins, R. and Denegri-Knott, J., 2016. Possession Work on Digital Consumption Objects and Consumer Ensnarement. Journal of the Association of Consumer Research [online]. 1 (2), 246-261.
Nau, D. S., 2008. Andy writes to his amputated leg. Journal of Family Psychotherapy [online], 8 (1), 1-12.
Ofcom, 2017. Fast facts [online]. Ofcom. Available from: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/media/facts [Accessed 15 May 2017].
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Leech, N. L., 2007. Validity and qualitative research: an oxymoron? Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology [online]. 41 (2), 233-249.
Pannucci, C. J. and Wilkins, E. G., 2010. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [online], 126 (2), 619-625.
Purewal, S. J., 2016. 12 things your smartphone has replaced [online]. Greenbot. Available from: http://www.greenbot.com/article/3109064/android/12-things-your-smartphone-has-replaced.html [Accessed 14 March 2017].
Richins, M., 1994. Valuing things, the public and private meanings of possessions. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 21 (3), 504-521.
Schiele, K. and Hughes, M. U., 2013. Possession rituals of the digital consumer: a study of Pinterest. European Advances in Consumer Research [online], 10 (47), 2-18.
Scott, D. M., 2015. The new rules of marketing and PR: how to use social media, online video, mobile applications, blogs, news releases, and viral marketing to reach buyers directly [online]. 5th edition. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Thompson, C., Locander, W. and Pollio, H., 1989. Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: the philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 16 (2), 133-146.
Tian, K. and Belk, R. W., 2005. Extended self and possessions in the workplace. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 32 (2), 297-310.
Watkins, R. D., Denegri-Knott, J. and Molesworth, M., 2016. The relationship between ownership and possession: observations from the context of digital virtual goods. Journal of Marketing Management [online], 32 (1), 44-70.